Skip to main content

CSS for Tables

Tables still have a place--for tabular data. Duh. Such as the Companies table in FDB. But I had to remember the CSS around tables.

First, the basic structure:

table
  thead
    tr
      th
  tbody
    tr
      td

Table

border-collapse: { separate (default) | collapse }
border-spacing: { #both | #horiz #vert } - default is 1px
empty-cells: { show (default) | hide }
table-layout: { auto (default) | fixed } - fixed is like !important for widths

For a responsive table, put it inside a container (e.g., div) with overflow-x: auto;

Width, height, border can be applied to table, th and td--not tr, thead or tbody.

Cells

th and td tags. CSS doesn't seem to like naked th and td. Prefer table td or table th selectors.

text-align: { left | center | top }
vertical-align: { top | bottom | middle }
padding
(margin doesn't do anything; use border-spacing)
border-bottom: - for just horizontal lines between rows

Rows

For a mouse-over to select whole rows at a time:
tr:hover { background-color: yellow; }

For alternating row colors:
tr:nth-child(even): { background-color: #f2e0f2; }

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A JSON Db Product?

The last post "solved" the problem of many-to-many table joins by papering over the association table with a RESTful JSON interface. As long as we're using JSON, we might as well take advantage of multi-valued table cells. I'm naturally wondering where this leads. JSON identifiers and types and SQL identifiers and types overlap so much that their intersection is a useful subset. Camel-case fields in string, number, bool flavors. Many-to-many occurs often in the world: Students in Classes Actors in Films (musicians on recorded songs) Parts in Assemblies Customers and Products (joined by Orders) The generalized description is that a Table requires a unique identifier for each row. Tables list students, actors, films, customers, and so on.  An Association Table is has two or more foreign keys that match unique identifiers in other tables. The knowledge of how a FK maps to a specific Table is baked in--we wouldn't want a "table name" column....

JSON/MySQL Schemas

As noted previously, there is a lot of overlap between the RDBMS world and the JSON world. Identifiers JSON is defined to allow identifiers of any kind of Unicode string, encoded in UTF-8 (or UTF-16, etc.). They begin and end with double quotation marks (U+0022), so included quotation marks and '\' must be escaped as \" or \\. Control characters (ASCII 0-x1F) must be escaped as well. In practice, JSON identifiers conform to ECMAScript standards . There are some 68  reserved keywords (function, import, for, if, else, and so on) that should not be used as identifiers. Unexpected reserved words include abstract, await, debugger, delete, finally, instanceof, super, synchronized, transient, volatile, and yield. The spec makes a distinction between identifiers and IdentifierNames (specifically, array keys), but why risk it? ECMAScript allows '$' and '_' anywhere in an identifier. Length or camelCasing are not part of the spec. As for length, there seems t...